fasadsip.blogg.se

Slimcleaner free vs plus
Slimcleaner free vs plus













slimcleaner free vs plus
  1. #SLIMCLEANER FREE VS PLUS FULL VERSION#
  2. #SLIMCLEANER FREE VS PLUS FULL#
  3. #SLIMCLEANER FREE VS PLUS PC#
  4. #SLIMCLEANER FREE VS PLUS PLUS#
  5. #SLIMCLEANER FREE VS PLUS WINDOWS 8#

If that’s all you need, CCleaner and SlimCleaner were clearly the most useful cleanup utilities due to their streamlined interfaces and ease of use (the fact that they’re free for personal use also helps).How SLIMCLEANER PLUS got on your computer? With that said, in the hands of an experienced user some of these utilities can be quite useful and make easy work of junk data and unwanted startup items.

#SLIMCLEANER FREE VS PLUS PC#

PC cleaning utilities have their uses, but the promise of quick fixes and enhanced performance are mostly bunk. That’s just gross, and unforgivable in my book.

#SLIMCLEANER FREE VS PLUS FULL#

And PC Booster set up a scheduled task that caused the application to pop-up onscreen asking users to register and buy the full version. Ashampoo WinOptimizer disabled the Touch Keyboard and Handwriting Panel Service, which really should have remained enabled on a multitouch-capable test system. Two of the tools, namely PC Booster and Ashampoo WinOptimizer, had a couple of unwanted consequences as well. I compiled the results below so you can see for yourself. In terms of recovered disk space, CCleaner was able to purge slightly more junk data from the system, but the differences between the apps were negligible. Presumably, that’s because in addition to cleaning up junk files it shut down a few services running in the background. In fact, according to PCMark 7 system performance went down ever so slightly after running SlimCleaner, CCleaner, and PC Booster, though boot time was improved somewhat with Ashampoo WinOptimizer. Your mileage may vary, but it made for a poor first impression on WIndows 8.ĬOMODO System Utilities v4 didn’t function properly on our Sony VAIO Tap 20 Windows 8-based PC.Īll of the other utilities worked well enough, but they didn’t have a meaningful impact on performance.

#SLIMCLEANER FREE VS PLUS WINDOWS 8#

(To be fair, Comodo does not list Windows 8 as a supported OS.) The utility would launch properly, but never fully initialize or scan the system properties, so no cleanup options became available in its interface. COMODO System Utilities wouldn’t run properly on the Windows 8 test machine, so I do not have any before and after numbers for that tool. Our benchmark tests were conclusive, but ultimately uneventful. Storage duties are handled by a Hitachi 750GB, 5400 RPM hard drive and the system is outfitted with a 20-inch touchscreen that packs a native resolution of 1600-by-900. The system is powered by an Intel Core i5-3317U 1.7GHz processor (2.6GHz with boost) with integrated Intel HD 4000 series graphics and 4GB of RAM.

slimcleaner free vs plus slimcleaner free vs plus

The test machine is an off-the-shelf Sony VAIO Tap 20 Windows 8 system that hasn’t been maintained at all for the last few months, save for automatically installing Windows Updates when necessary. To replicate real-world conditions I stuck to a straightforward test routine while evaluating the effects of each of the cleanup utilities featured here. The other tools can be used to manually tweak startup items as well, which might be more palatable to experienced PC users who want to get their hands dirty. One of them-namely Ashampoo WinOptimizer-will also automatically check for superfluous startup items or services and disable them to free up memory and improve boot times. They also scan the registry to find any unnecessary keys that can be removed. They scan your system for junk or useless data that’s just wasting space and mark it for deletion. SlimCleaner uses community-sourced information to determine what data is safe to purge from a system.Īll of the utilities featured here work in roughly the similar fashion.

#SLIMCLEANER FREE VS PLUS FULL VERSION#

For reference, 2830 issues were found on our test machine and it would cost $35 for the full version that would supposedly fix them all. That’s just not enough to be useful in the real world. See, the free edition of PC Booster gives users the ability to fix only 15 issues. COMODO System Utilities wasn’t too far behind at 13.2MB and the free edition of PC Booster came in at a paltry 2.7MB, but it turned out to be severely limited in its usefulness. Both are completely free for personal use, don’t include any useless or bloated software, sport simple interfaces, and weigh in at only 718K (SlimCleaner) and 4MB (CCleaner).Īshampoo WinOptimizer was the largest of the bunch at 16.9MB and had the most complicated interface. SlimCleaner and CCleaner are the no-nonsense members of the group. Piriform CCleaner is best suited to experienced PC users that want to know what they’re cleaning from their systems.















Slimcleaner free vs plus